Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikimedia Foundation stays quiet about 2 recent—and rare—'global bans'

Hoi,

My blog needs no sensationalist out-dated blurbs.. I am happy to be topical, timely and if that is boring to you all the more reason why I do not bother people with it. It is there for them if they want it.

If you mean by free speech that you can say what you like and say it loudly where you are explicitly not wanted, then your idea of free speech is not what I support.
Thanks,

      Gerard

On 11 January 2015 at 09:52, Toby Dollmann <toby.dollmann@gmail.com> wrote:

Gerard

You write your boring blog and I'll write mine.

I don't see on your blog any actual reasons why Demiurge1000 and
Dcoetzee are global banned by WMF.

All the more reason for Wikimedia Foundation to throttle free speech
and instead promote child pornography, libels, digital piracy and
slanted / paid edits. Its easy for them considering Google has
invested millions of dollars in financing Wikimedia and supporting
Jimmy Wales' extravagant lifestyle and alimony payments.

Toby

On 1/11/15, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hoi,

> I blog almost every day and it is as topical. I am not a bore that I send
> lists about an opinion..
> Thanks,
>      GerardM

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wikimedia-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wikimedia-l+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.