Sunday, 27 March 2016

Wikipedia Sucks )Finally( www.wikipediasucks.xyz launched

Wikipedia Sucks is the new Wikipedia criticism site from India Against Corruption. Described by IAC as a bonafide non-commercial fair use Wikipedia criticism it claims free speech to Hasten The Day (HTD).  

The domain owners say ".. this domain name is not for sale at any cost. .. "

Previously WMF had declared, "We have enough people discussing things by email that having a dedicated website to make our discussions public and archived would be useful and bring us closer in alignment to Wikimedia community precedent of being transparent"

Our mission is to expose the corruption at Wikimedia Foundation projects  so as to educate the innocent public at large in India (and only India) about the realms of pornography, disinformation, libels and undisclosed paid editing that is hosted on the “encyclopedia that anyone can edit.” (but where defamed article subjects rarely can).

Disclaimer:  "All text on this website is machine translated from the original Hindi language.text so E&oe. The domain owner will only correspond in the Hindi language. This India designated website is regulated by provisions of India's Information Technology Act 2000=. with jurisdictions of courts at New Delhi, India"

FAQ:
1) What is Wikipedia ?
A) Now banned Quora user Ron Maimon reviewed it at Wikipedia is a failed project.
It was, from 2001-2006, a great experiment in collaborative writing, but it failed from 2007-2010, closed itself off, and became impossible to edit. This turned it into a totalitarian democracy where you need to tow the line to stay in the organization. Anyone who is politically slightly less than popular, or has a strange idea, is marginalized, ostracized, and finally blocked. It still has good content, almost all from before 2007, which can be freely used in a later fork.

2) Wikipedia is an "encyclopedia" (like the Encyclopedia Britannica) , so how can you criticize it ?
A)  Short answer :(to be populated and expanded) Because ....
  • [Unreliable] articles written by cabals of well entrenched anonymous editors
  • [Unsafe] for children
  • [Pornography] at every [Commons]
  • [Mob rule] administration structure manipulated by [anonymous admins]
  • [Paid editing]
  • [Sock-puppetry]
  • [Defamation] [spam engine] with attendant [extortion] demands
  • [Privacy breaches]
  • [Wikimedia Foundation Inc.]
Other fine 3rd party WIKPEDIASUCKS online resources to experience the extent of the global WIKIPEDIASUCKS movement.